Thursday, August 29, 2024

Issue:

Mackay and Whitsunday Life

Lack Of Access To Rural Healthcare Causing More Hospitalisations

Troubling figures released earlier this week show many illnesses among rural, regional and remote Australians could have been prevented or treated better with accessible primary care, thus avoiding the need for hospitalisation.
 
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), many parts of rural Australia have higher rates of potentially preventable hospitalisations, highlighting the need for early interventions and ongoing care, particularly for non-communicable diseases. Unfortunately, Australia’s rural populations, which make up over 7 million people, often lack access to such preventive measures.
 
“We often see rural communities neglecting or putting off their health issues due to limited access to primary care, exacerbated by the tyranny of distance and cost of services. This leads to a cascade of problems, including overwhelming an already strained hospital and emergency system,” said the National Rural Health Alliance Chief Executive Susi Tegen.
 
“This brings us to consider the need to increase strategic and fit-for-purpose investment in rural health care.

“Given Australia’s annual health spending deficit of $6.55 billion in rural Australia, as discovered through independent research last year, we strongly advocate for greater investment in rural health care for communities, which enable multidisciplinary and place-based solutions according to needs.
 
“The Alliance proposes the Primary care Rural Integrated Multidisciplinary Health Services (PRIM-HS) model, which is community-led and co-designed to meet the specific health needs of communities to promote the preventative aspect of health.”
 
Ms Tegen added that the model aims to improve primary healthcare experiences, provide culturally safe, high-quality care which would become a major contributor to reduce the rates of potentially preventable hospitalisations in rural, regional and remote Australia, with federal and state /territory government partnership.
“Government funding to support this model would mean more rural primary care practices could continue to exist or be established in rural areas to provide essential care that many metropolitan communities take for granted,” Ms Tegen said.

National Rural Health Alliance Chief Executive Susi Tegen

In other news